(Excerpt from an
HR e-portal. Posted on 21 Jun, 2016)
Raghuram Rajan's
decision to return to academia in the US after just 3 years as RBI's Governor exposes
India's inability to retain expat talent in key positions and has other
connotations.
We want the best to
work for us, but an environment of autonomy or creativity is seldom given to
the best of brains to flourish.
This indeed is the
story of Raghuram Rajan, RBI’s governor, who has decided to step down when his three years of tenure ends in
September and return to academia in the US. Although this decision has been
perceived as a big loss for India in terms of talent, it has simultaneously
brought to the fore, the difficulty of adapting to the culture the connotations
of which go beyond just the political and organizational set up, to talent management,
building a culture that allows autonomy and creativity and India’s inability to
manage institutional organization.
Regardless of political
ideology, analysts converged in worrying about the ability of the government to
attract and retain talent and how talent deficit at political level and at
civil servants’ level can be the biggest roadblock for Modi’s execution of his
ambitious vision.
The impact that this
loss will have on the Indian economy will be significant: On the one hand, post
liberalization every single RBI governor has had at least five years in office.
Globally, central bank governors stay on for over six years as a sign of policy
stability. Rajan’s decision of departure after just three years has already
sent negative signals about the management of the Indian economy. On the other
hand, in his short period as RBI governor, global investors and international
agencies saw him as a leader who invested in stabilizing the economy, curbing
inflation and forcing banks to declare losses. His stepping down will bring
uncertainty and worry to global investors.
It is also a potential
loss of future talent that may consider coming back to India. This instance of
culture clash that many expats reflect upon when they return after living and
working abroad is very conspicuous as there is an inability to fit to the
culture. Differences in understanding, lack of autonomy, power and independence
can be frustrating and sometime unmanageable. That is probably what has
happened so many times when expatriating talent and looks like is the same case
here as well.
India has a huge pool
of talent abroad that is willing to serve the country. Rajan continues to hold
an Indian passport and has expressed his desire to continue to contribute to
India’s growth, but his return to the US is not only an opportunity loss for
RBI but also a signal that the culture and ecosystem is not inclusive enough to
attract and retain key talent willing to return to contribute.
No comments:
Post a Comment